.
-- On Scripture and Prophecy --
.

/ Newsgroups > alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.christnet.evangelical, alt.christnet.theology, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity,
/ alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox /
Christian Forums > Theology (Christian Only) > Unorthodox Theology / Date > 8 Feb 2012 / Topic >

The Gospel of Arrogance & Vanity

>> cybrwurm previously wrote: <snip> And who do you choose to
help you understand and interpret
>> the texts that you find in the bible?

.
> vince garcia replies: not you. I do quite a fine job without you, as do tens of thousands of fine Christian
> ministers preaching the REAL Christ

.
] In 'Which Came First: The Church or the New Testament?' one Fr. James Bernstein say: <snip> So we'd all appeal to the Scriptures.
] "I believe in the Bible. If it's not in the Bible I don't believe it", became my war cry. What I did not realize was that everyone else
] was saying the same thing! It was not the Bible, but each one's private interpretation of it, that became our ultimate authority.
.
wurm say: Are you hearing this, vince?
.
] In an age which highly exalts independence of thought and self-reliance, I was becoming my own pope! The guidelines I used in
] interpreting Scripture seemed simple enough: When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense. I
] believed that those who were truly faithful and honest in following this principle would achieve Christian unity. To my surprise,
] this "common sense" approach led not to increased Christian clarity and unity, but rather to a spiritual free-for-all! Those who
] most strongly adhered to believing "only the Bible" tended to become the, most factious, divisive, and combative of Christians …

.
Does this sound like anyone you know, pope garcia?
.
] In fact, it seemed to me that the more one held to the Bible as the only source of spiritual authority, the more factious and
] sectarian one became ... But the more sectarian I became - to the point of being obnoxious and antisocial - the more I began
] to realize that something was seriously wrong with my approach to Christianity.
.
vince has yet to reach this stage of wisdom, but we may all hope that one day he will see the light. Anyway, the solution that
Father Bernstein eventually arrived at, after a long and exhaustive study of early church history and the gradual formation
of the NT canon, is that the authority to interpret scripture properly resides with the church. And so Father Bernstein promptly
and logically converted to the Orthodox faith!

.
And while this "solution" to the problem of authority does have the merit of being somewhat more sensible than the 'every man
his own pope' approach (which is not a solution at all), all he has done (in effect) is to move from the camp of the scribes over
to the camp of the pharisees! And the only problem with this is that it *avoids* and side-steps the problem of authority, rather
than addressing it head on. For what his studies failed to make clear is that while spiritual authority is indeed closely tied to
the spirit, that spirit is NOT given to bishops, councils, and particular denominations; let alone to every believer who has
gained the fabulous ability to stick his beak into the scriptures and call them his own.

.
No indeed, for the spirit of wisdom and truth is only given to certain individuals; to those few and far between men who are
specifically chosen and sent. And it is up to the Lord to decide who is chosen. Much as they would like to think otherwise, the
spirit is not a thing that can be captured and co-opted by institutions. Not even the greatest of churches can decide who will
receive the spirit and who will not. For that is a matter for the divine-Logos to determine!

.
"And we have the prophetic word made more sure. You will do well to pay attention to this as to a lamp shining in a
dark place, until the
day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. First of all you must understand this, that
no prophecy of scripture is a matter of
one's own interpretation, because no prophecy ever came by the impulse of
man, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God."
-- 2Peter 1:19-21 / RSV
.
Here then is the one and only *biblical* solution to the problem of interpretive authority. It is those men who are "moved by
the spirit" who have the grace and ability to interpret scripture with authority. And these men are called prophets (or "slaves"
as per Jm 1:1, Jude 1:1, 2Pet 1:1). But wait! The scribes will now object that this is not a solution at all owing to the rather
obvious "fact" that there are no longer any prophets. John the Baptist was the last prophet, they say, and there haven't been
any prophets since.

.
What an incredibly stupid thing to say! It's like saying that since the first century there hasn't been any man named Samuel! 
And WHY have the prophets suddenly gone extinct? Because, they claim, they are no longer needed, because now they have
been replaced by the New Testament, and thus rendered null and void. No longer needed! Right, that's why we have half the
believers in the world thinking that they are themselves the only ultimate authority; ‘little popes’ who need not acknowledge
any authority above themselves! Obviously the *need* for prophets is apparent to anyone who bothers to think about these
things. But the need for believers to recognize the ongoing *reality* of the prophets is even more needful ...

.
For it is these very same so-called “bible-believers” – the same ones who say "I believe in the Bible; if it's not in the Bible I
don't believe it" - who ignore every single reference to the prophets given in the NT (and there are *many*), because they
know better than the inspired authors (including Paul and John) who everywhere acknowledge the necessity and reality of the
prophets. They know the Word of God is *wrong*, that God is indeed a liar, because they "know" there are no more prophets!
If all these wise and knowledgeable (ie. in their own eyes, of course; but in reality their wisdom is arrogance and their
knowledge is vanity) "bible-believers" had even an ounce of honesty within them they would change their "war cry" to
something that actually reflects the truth:

.
"I believe in the Bible; *except* when it speaks about the prophets. If it's not in the Bible I don't believe it (except as regards
the unbiblical trinitarian fantasy); and even if it IS in the Bible I *still* don't believe it, because *I* know that the prophets
are not real, and therefore the scriptures are *wrong* (except when I think they are right, of course)!"

.
For this is indeed the true basis for the Faith of half the believers in the entire world. And this despite the contrary
testimony of the Word of God (which they *claim* is the ultimate spiritual authority); such as these universally
mistranslated verses (which foolish believers may choose to ignore, to their eternal peril):

.
"Now to the one [ie. the "slave" or prophet of Christ] who is able to guard you without stumbling and to set you before
the only God
... [grant him] glory, majesty, dominion, and authority before all the age and now and into all the ages."
-- Jude 24 & 25 / Prophet Version
 


– the almost slavish one ~ cybrwurm ;>


zeke34

/ Christian Forums > Theology (Christian Only) > Unorthodox Theology / Topic > Re: The Gospel of Arrogance and Vanity / Date > 9 Feb 2012 /
.
] On Feb9 josephearl say: The main doctrinal truths of the Bible are not all that hard to understand. IF one is willing
] to submit their opinions to the main and plain of what is written.
.
wurm replies: Sure thing there, josephearl. Two of the main truths given in the OT is that God is one, and that idolatry is wrong
and very very bad. These doctrines are the very foundation of the Faith we share with our jewish brothers. And yet neither of
these great and true teachings of classical Judaism has prevented christians from turning god into a three-headed beast, or
stopped them from idolizing the Bible through doctrines that attribute divine qualities and attributes to an earthly thing.
So yes, I agree, easy to understand, but (alas) even easier to ignore!  
.
] New Testament prophets who lay claim to authority that entails forcing
] others to their view are false.
.
You just called the apostle Paul a false prophet, my friend. Perhaps you'd like to adjust this statement somewhat?
.
] When they preach and teach words that are contrary to what is plainly written they are false.
.
Does this include non-prophets as well? When overseers (ie. bishops), apologists, councils, and the early fathers "
preach and teach words that are contrary to what is plainly written", are they *also* false? 
.
] When others say that there are no prophets today they are false.
.
If you mean that believers are wrong to say such a thing, then I tend to agree.  
.
] <snip> The prophets words were from God, but God does not over-ride our free will to choose. <snip>
.
I think your view of inspiration could use a little more work there, josephearl.
.
] Not sure what your point is, but these are some simple truths on prophets in the age of grace.
.
The point was to grapple with the thorny problem of spiritual authority "in the age of grace". If you agree that there
are prophets today, then I assume you also agree that they are the ones who can (and should) interpret the scriptures
with authority? But not, I hasten to add, to the end of *forcing* other believers to accept their (ie. my) views and teachings ...

evangelist

/ Newsgroups > alt.bible.prophecy, alt.religion.christian, alt.bible, alt.christnet.philosophy, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy /
/ Christian Forums > Theology (Christian Only) > Christian Scriptures / Date > 13 Feb 2012 / Topic >


Why the Prophets Must Write

 Sometimes - on very rare occasions, to be sure - the light shines so brightly within that we could not stop the flow of words even
if we wanted to. At these rare (but joyful) times the Logos-light (ie. the prophetic-spirit of the divine-Logos) kicks into high-gear
and makes the process of composition and writing truly effortless. It's a very liberating feeling, for sure, and it often gives the
impression that the inspired author really does feel like a *tool* :)
.
Ummm, no; what we *really* mean is that this almost-supernatural event is doubtless the cause of brother-Jeremiah's feeling that
he is simply taking dictation, and that it is the god that is "actually" doing the writing ... Most of the time, however (and alas),
writing is merely "10% inspiration and 90% perspiration" (as some wit once put it). And so we sincerely hope that *every* reader
is unable to tell which of my (many and various) writings came from which source! So anyway, the point of all this is to show the
Reader the way that inspiration actually works in reality: namely, it VARIES! It waxes and wanes. It comes; and then it goes. And
who knows whither or why? Certainly not eye.
.
And when it's gone for more than a few days ... *then* I am struck with writer's block, unable to write anything at all. What condition
can be worse than being a writer who can't write? ... Why it's a travesty! A mockery, I say! A sham, and a fraud, and murder most foul!
 :(  So there you go. This is why the prophets call themselves slaves, and worms, and utterly null and void: For *everything* depends
upon the Other! And THAT is the secret of true prophecy (christian *and* otherwise).

- the almost inspired one ~ cybrwurm ;>

P.S.  Historical variations on the same spiritual theme: Aton, Brahma, Tao, Yahweh, Athena, Sophia, Buddha, Father, Allah!
... Think about it! :)




/ Christian Forums > Theology (Christian Only) > Christian Scriptures / Date > 14 Feb 2012 / Topic > Re: Why the Prophets Must Write /
.
> wurm said: <snip> Historical variations on the same spiritual theme:
> Aton, Brahma, Tao, Yahweh, Athena, Sophia, Buddha, Father, Allah! <snipped by j>
.
] josephearl say: The difference is these all prophesy from either their own carnal minds or a demonic spirit
.
So then you would agree that Socrates was posessed by a daemon-spirit (as he didst himself claim)?
.
] except Father if by its use you are speaking of God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ
.
Whose name is ABBA, btw ... And *also* called "the Father of Lights" (in the NT).
.
] and the giver of all true and pure prophetic words by His Holy Spirit.
.
Not sure what you mean by 'pure', josephearl; but I'm rather curious as to why you imagine that the prophetic-word does not or
cannot exist outside of Christianity? It's a rather odd
*assumption* on your part; given that the OT is chock full of all kinds of
prophets. Logically,
then, we may safely assume that the god's vision and power are truly universal, such that *names* are far
too small to block the flow of wisdom and truth ...

Or even grace, for that matter! snoopy



/ Date > 16 Feb 2012 / Topic > On Defending Unknown Prophets /
.
] josephearl say: ... I can see no reason for Him to speak at all through a non-believer to a believer
.
wurm say: Really? ... Would you like a good reason? How about this > The Lord wants *everyone* to stop living in the darkness,
and come into the light of grace and truth. And if this means speaking to people through the knowledge and wisdom of "a non-
believer", then who are we to say "No, the Light belongs to us and is ours alone"? ... I have no problem with you wanting to stay
pure and faithful to the things you know, josephearl. However, this negative approach to universal wisdom also has a severe
down-side ...

.
] although I would imagine He does at times. <snip>
.
Yes; so then we agree. Such as at this time, when an important observation was made by the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus:
"True knowledge derives from existing things." And this radiant gem of wisdom and truth is easily as *sacred* as almost anything
you may find in the wisdom-literature section of your bibles. So you see how easy it is for the divine-Logos to generate "sacred text"
even from out of minds that you would judge to be non-christian.

.
] j: It should be a rarity and not the norm.
.
But that's just it, josephearl; it IS the norm! The prophets are everywhere. Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Soren K., William Blake, George Fox,
etc, etc. And these are just some of the christian prophets you don't know. There are many more in other cultures, times, and
languages that we don't even know about. The divine-Logos is not stingy with the words of truth and grace and wisdom. Just
because they are not as authoritative as the NT's top-ten docs does not mean that you are free to just ignore everything else that
the divine-Logos speaks through human-beings.

.
] j: Jesus said He would speak to us through the Holy Spirit
.
And he does. Through inspired prophets all over the world, and through all the ages. A collected pile of all prophectic-literature
through history up to the present time would produce a small mountain of sacred and semi-sacred texts! Yes, the Word is *very*
prolific. Please do check it out. :)

.
] and the Lord has placed prophets in the church and we also know that ALL can prophesy.
.
Read the text, j. All believers can and should *aspire* to be prophets, but not all are called to be the eyes in the head of the
body-of-christos (that is, the universal-spiritual church). The body also needs believers who are hands and feet and mouths.
But as to who shall be the eyes ... that matter is reserved for the divine-Logos.

.
] j: In the context of that last verse it is believers who are the all. love ya, JE
.
"the all" ???
.
> x141 say: ... I know my Father's voice, I will not follow another, I have one who leads me.
.
wurm say: So do we, x. We know Jesus Christos as the divine-Logos and "the one teacher", as per the gospel of John.
Why then do you close your ears when the Word speaks through other people? This does not seem reasonable.
Surely you're not suggesting that your Lord and my Lord are two different Lords?

.
] Rufus Jones say: "The true and essential Word of God is the divine revelation in the soul of man."

first-century Mk ms!

/ Christian Forums > Theology Christians Only > Christian Scriptures / Topic >

Re: Why prophets write

> On Feb18 josephearl say: <snip> And what really is the point of starting this thread here?
> I would think its proper place is unorthodox theology.
.
wurm say: Really, j? Look again at the opening-post:
.
] zjones90 quoted from the book of mormon: Why did the prophets write? To bring us to Christ,
] for they knew Him personally and knew that "there is none other name given under heaven
] save it be this Jesus Christ . . . whereby man can be saved." ... "For we labor diligently to
] write, to persuade our children, and also our brethren, to believe in Christ, and to be reconciled
] to God; for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do." 2Ne.25:20&23
.
wurm: I don't see anything here that belongs in the unorthodox theology forum, josephearl ...
.
Do you?
.
] zjones90 say: From about 600 b.c. until 435 a.d., 8 centuries.
.
wurm: 6bc to 4ad is TEN centuries by my count. Are you sure you have all your facts straight?



> wurm wrote: ... I don't see anything here that belongs in the unorthodox theology forum,
> josephearl ... Do you?
.
] On 20Feb josephearl replies: As a matter of fact I do see unorthodoxy here.
.
wurm say: And yet none of the "perverse teachings" you mention are present in the text that zjones90
and I just quoted. Therefore your impassioned objections have NO relevance to the current topic ...
which is why prophets write. In other words: You do NOT see any unorthodoxy *there*! And that is the
text that friend zjones90 and I are discussing. If you have nothing pertinent to say regarding the topic
at hand, then why don't you just find a more interesting thread in another forum, eh?
.
] j: You quote a verse from Nephi as if it is Christian scripture and it is not.
.
I did no such thing, josephearl. I just quoted what zjones90 wrote. He may think that they are scripture,
but I don't. That's why I asked him what Ne is. Right, josephearl? You don't have to worry that he's going
to convert me; if that's what you're upset about.
.
] j: And frankly I find it disgusting the number of times a so-called follower of Jesus trys to teach
] others that Mormonism is Christian. It is a polytheistic hodge-podge of gods and blasphemes
] the truth by its perverse teachings <snip>
.
But we aren't even discussing *any* of that, josephearl. Discussions of *that* nature obviously belong in
the unorthodox theology forum. Hey dude, I do believe that YOU are braking the forum-rules! 


textman
*